Tokyo Electric scrutinised over slow response
Ken Belson, Tokyo
March 21, 2011
ternyata Jepang, sebagai negara maju juga bisa korup
apalagi Indonesia, yang terkenal sebagai negara terkorup di dunia
bahaya pengelolaan nuklir BUKAN KARENA KECERDASAN ILMUWAN INDONESIA, TETAPI KEBIJAKAN dan PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN YANG KORUP
adagium Lord Acton: power tends to corrupt
absolute power corrupts absolutely
NEW questions have arisen over whether Tokyo Electric Power Company executives wasted precious time early in the nuclear crisis, either because of complacency or because they did not want to use emergency measures that could destroy their valuable investment.
The question of timing is critical. Because the earthquake and the tsunami knocked out the Fukushima No. 1 plant's ability to pump fresh water into either the reactors or the spent fuel pools - potent sources of radioactive material as they heated up - plant operators eventually had to improvise. And mounting radiation levels hampered workers' ability to enter the plant, gauge the damage and contain the crisis.
Nuclear experts said that executives thought they had enough time because the reactors shut down automatically after the earthquake, and did not realise the risk from the highly radioactive spent fuel rods, which are still emitting heat.
Advertisement: Story continues below
The question is whether they waited too long before pumping seawater into the plant, a measure that would ruin a valuable investment.
Kuni Yogo, a former atomic energy policy planner in Japan's Science and Technology Agency, said he believed the executives at Tokyo Electric Power, or TEPCO, did not recognise the risks soon enough. They failed to cool the reactors on the day of the earthquake, and even after a hydrogen explosion the following day they waited more than four hours to start dousing the reactors with seawater. They did not even try to put water into the spent fuel pools for several days.
''On Friday afternoon, they weren't in a panic,'' Mr Yogo said. ''Their main concern was the reactors, and they had shut down automatically. They could have prepared earlier to deal with the spent fuel.''
Michael Friedlander, a former senior operator at a Pennsylvania power plant with General Electric reactors similar to the troubled ones in Japan, said the crucial question was whether Japanese officials followed GE's emergency operating procedures. Those procedures were ''crystal clear'' on how to determine when reactors should be flooded, he said, and plant operators should have practised many times how to flood them with seawater.
The procedures prescribe specific actions based on variables such as reactor temperature and pressure, data that TEPCO has not yet released.
A former TEPCO executive told The Wall Street Journal that the company had hesitated to ruin the plant with seawater. A TEPCO spokesman told the newspaper that the company, ''taking the safety of the whole plant into consideration, was trying to judge the appropriate timing to use seawater''.
It has also emerged that days before Japan plunged into an atomic crisis at the ageing Fukushima nuclear plant, its operator had admitted faking repair records.
NEW YORK TIMES, AFP
March 19, 2011
Reeling From Crises, Japan Approaches Familiar Crossroads
By NORIMITSU ONISHI
TOKYO — Such was the power of the magnitude 9.0 earthquake on March 11 that it bent the tip of Tokyo Tower, the 1,093-foot Eiffel-like structure that has stood as the symbol of Japan’s postwar rebirth for half a century. For the first time since it was erected in 1958, the tower no longer points directly upward, the direction that Japan followed for much of its history after World War II.
The earthquake, whose epicenter was more than 200 miles north of here, and the resulting nuclear crisis, will change this nation. The open question is how, and how much. Will it, along with the bent Tokyo Tower, be a final marker of an irreversible decline? Or will it be an opportunity to draw on the resilience of a people repeatedly tested by calamity to reshape Japan — in the mold of either the left or the right? This disaster, like the 1923 Tokyo earthquake and the 1995 Kobe earthquake, could well signal a new era.
Among the concerns raising questions are the shrinking, starting in 2005, of Japan’s population, the country’s loss to China last year of its vaunted status as the world’s second-largest economy and the aggressive pursuit of nuclear power.
Japan’s economy is likely to suffer, at least in the short term, as power disruptions hobble its industries. If the reactors do melt down, in the worst case, or even if there is a steady release of radioactive vapor, there are implications for public health; on Saturday, the Japanese government announced that some foodstuffs from farms near the nuclear plant contained elevated levels of radiation. Japan’s reputation — and its self-image — as an efficient, prosperous and smoothly functioning society has been dealt a blow.
“It’s not an exaggeration to say that we will think of Japan in terms of pre-earthquake and post-earthquake because it has already fundamentally changed Japanese society,” said Yasuyuki Shimizu, a 39-year-old who has drawn attention in Japan for the work of his organization, Life Link, in preventing suicides. “The values of postwar Japan, and the postwar feeling of security, also now lie in ruins. Whether Japan will change in a positive or negative way, we don’t know yet.”
But others argue that the long-term impact on Japan will be more limited — so long as the troubled reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, about 170 miles north of here, do not suffer a complete meltdown and affect Tokyo, the nation’s heart. Despite the psychological shock to the nation, the earthquake and tsunami devastated a thinly populated region far from Tokyo and the nation’s other center of gravity, Osaka in western Japan.
“If the nuclear problem doesn’t get bigger, and there’s no panic in the Tokyo area, and no curfew that’s imposed, I don’t think this disaster will be remembered as that significant an incident,” said Eiji Oguma, 49, a professor of policy management at Keio University, adding that he thought it would be compared instead with the 1995 Kobe earthquake, which, rather than spurring lasting change, came to be seen as a symbol of the end of Japan’s bubble era.
Still others saw the disaster as a moment for change, including Takafumi Horie, 38, an entrepreneur who lost his Internet company, Livedoor, in 2006 on minor charges of securities fraud after brashly challenging the business establishment.
“It’s possible that this calamity will rid Japan of its old order,” Mr. Horie, now one of Japan’s most popular authors and bloggers, wrote in an e-mail, adding, “It’s an opportunity to build a new Japan.”
But first is the rebuilding. There are many factors working against Japan’s ability to carry it out as successfully as it has in the past: the absence of strong national leadership, the country’s declining economic strength and the simple lack of young people in the northern region.
When Japan resurrected itself after even bigger disasters, like the 1923 earthquake that destroyed Tokyo or the war that ended with the atomic destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan was a vigorous, young and growing country, said Kazutoshi Hando, 80, a historian of the period between the Meiji Restoration in 1868, when Japan began its drive to modernize, and World War II. Today, the population is expected to keep shrinking.
“Just as we were thinking this was a problem we had to tackle now, this catastrophe occurred,” Mr. Hando said of the declining population. “This has slowed us down. That’s the biggest problem. We’ll simply run out of workers.”
Still, Mr. Hando, who survived the American wartime firebombings that destroyed much of Tokyo, said that Japan had defied everyone’s expectations by rising quickly from the ashes.
“Based on my experience of the war and its aftermath, I think Japan will be all right,” he said.
Mr. Hando talked of tapping the Japanese people’s “hidden strength” — an expression that has appeared repeatedly in the Japanese news media in the past week, one that politicians have also seized. Implicit in the praise of Japanese traits of endurance, perseverance and grace — strengths evident in the orderly response to the unfathomable destruction up north — is a criticism of the perceived values that led to the nuclear accidents: the postwar blind pursuit of material wealth and comfort that put 55 nuclear reactors on some of the world’s most unstable land, despite Japan’s singular history as the target of atomic bombs.
“Japan stood at the top once before, so it’s all right if it becomes second class,” said Mitsuru Nakamura, 62, who was chatting with a friend in front of an apartment building near Tokyo Tower on Friday morning. He added: “It should become a country where the elderly and children can live safely. The improvement of people’s lives should become important.”
Being No. 20 in the world was enough, his friend added.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, nationalist politicians — who have long said that postwar Japanese have become selfish and unwilling to sacrifice for the nation’s good — are already trying to harness those sentiments in a different direction.
Shintaro Ishihara, the governor of Tokyo, said the quake and tsunami were “divine punishment” that “should be used” to “sweep away” the Japanese people’s “selfishness,” “materialism” and “worship of money.”
Sitting inside her small tobacco shop in the Toranomon neighborhood, Mitsuko Watanabe, 80, also pointed to selfishness and untrustworthy leaders as factors undermining Japanese society.
“When a country’s leaders are bad, natural disasters occur,” she said and, unprompted, referred to the governor. “I’m not Shintaro, but I think divine punishment isn’t wrong.”
Ms. Watanabe and her husband have owned the tobacco shop, which faces Tokyo Tower, for close to six decades. She said she had watched construction workers raise the tower, which instantly became a symbol of Japan’s rise after World War II. The nation hailed its soaring height, the claim that it was the world’s tallest self-supported steel structure and its use to transmit a new technology, television.
Yoshihiro Watanabe, a spokesman for Nippon Television City, said that it was the first time that an earthquake had bent Tokyo Tower. The company has yet to decide when to straighten it.
In Toranomon shop owners facing the tower said they were confident that Japan would pull itself up.
“Rebuilding after World War II was much more difficult,” said Hayato Kikukawa, 32, the owner of a small cafe, adding that straightening Tokyo Tower should not be a priority.
But at a nearby udon restaurant, where he was getting ready for the lunchtime crowd, Keiichi Shimoda, 48, said, “If they fix Tokyo Tower, then I’ll think, now things are all right.”
Fuhito Shimoyama contributed reporting.